|
|
SHORT COMMUNICATION |
|
Year : 2022 | Volume
: 4
| Issue : 2 | Page : 103-106 |
|
Exploring the impact of coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic on malaria and identifying the strategies for the containment of twin infections
Saurabh Rambiharilal Shrivastava, Prateek Saurabh Shrivastava
Department of Community Medicine, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth – Deemed to be University, Nellikuppam, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India
Date of Submission | 11-Dec-2021 |
Date of Decision | 22-Mar-2022 |
Date of Acceptance | 24-Mar-2022 |
Date of Web Publication | 27-Jun-2022 |
Correspondence Address: Dr. Saurabh Rambiharilal Shrivastava Department of Community Medicine, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth – Deemed to be University, Tiruporur - Guduvancheri Main Road, Ammapettai, Nellikuppam, Chengalpattu - 603 108, Tamil Nadu India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
DOI: 10.4103/jin.jin_59_21
The emergence of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outbreak and its rapid transmission in different parts of the world has become a major public health challenge. Considering the consequences of malaria in the past, it is the need of the hour that in the process of containing COVID-19, we should not ignore the strategies aimed toward the prevention and control of malaria infection. There is no point in complaining about the developments that have already happened, the best strategy will be to consider the different facets of COVID-19 infection containment as opportunities and then act accordingly. In the process of fighting against the COVID-19 infection, we have ignored the delivery of essential services pertaining to malaria. This calls for the need to revisit the planned and implemented services for COVID-19 infection and use the existing mechanism for implementing the strategies required for malaria elimination.
Keywords: Community, coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic, malaria
How to cite this article: Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS. Exploring the impact of coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic on malaria and identifying the strategies for the containment of twin infections. J Integr Nurs 2022;4:103-6 |
How to cite this URL: Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS. Exploring the impact of coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic on malaria and identifying the strategies for the containment of twin infections. J Integr Nurs [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 30];4:103-6. Available from: https://www.journalin.org/text.asp?2022/4/2/103/348376 |
Introduction | |  |
The emergence of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outbreak and its rapid transmission in different parts of the world has become a major public health challenge.[1] Owing to the magnitude of the disease and the attributed deaths, the novel viral infection has accounted for huge global interruptions, especially in the health sector and delivery of welfare measures.[1] In fact, the recent report depicts that as of December 7, 2021, in excess of 265 million cases and 5.2 million deaths have been attributed to the infection.[2] Even though the pandemic has affected all the nations, considering the weakness in the health-care delivery system, its impact is bound to be more in the case of low-and middle-income nations.[1],[3]
Malaria is a parasitic infection, which predominantly affects the African region and other developing nations, and that close to 50% of the world's population resides in malaria-endemic settings.[4] In 2020, more than 240 million cases and 0.63 million malarial deaths have been reported worldwide. We must note that in 2019 (pre-COVID-19 era), 227 million cases and 0.57 million deaths were reported.[4] One of the potential reasons for the reported rise in the incidence and the death rates could be due to the interruption of the basic services required for the containment of the malarial infection, as all the existing resources were redirected toward the prevention and control of COVID-19 infection.[4],[5],[6]
It is important to note that patients with malaria or COVID-19 infection can present with similar kinds of clinical features (such as fever, weakness, sudden onset headache, and breathing difficulties), which might account for a false diagnosis of COVID-19 for malaria and vice versa, especially when the physician depends on clinical features alone.[7] We have organized the content under the following subheadings, namely COVID-19 impact on health system, interruption of malaria services, and potential strategies to contain COVID-19 and malaria.
Coronavirus Disease-2019 Impact on Health System | |  |
On a positive note, in the period of 2000–2020, a total of 23 nations has accomplished elimination of malaria in their nations as they have reported zero indigenous malaria cases for 3 successive years.[4] As the battle against the novel infection continues, we must acknowledge that it is extremely difficult to mobilize resources, especially in those nations which have multiple other competing public health priorities.[6],[8] The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed an immense strain on the health-care delivery system and the policymakers are in a state of dilemma, wherein they have to not only deal with the dual threat of COVID-19 and malaria but even ensure that the outreach workers involved in malaria prevention and control are safeguarded from the novel viral infection.[5],[6],[8]
Interruption of Malaria Services | |  |
Considering the consequences of malaria in the past, it is the need of the hour that in the process of containing COVID-19, we should not ignore the strategies aimed toward the prevention and control of malaria infection.[9],[10] In other words, the attention to COVID-19 does not mean that we fall short in our efforts to contain the vector population or ensure timely management of the parasitic infection.[9],[10],[11] The findings of different studies and reports have revealed that the ongoing pandemic has disrupted a wide range of activities at different levels, including the use of insecticide-treated bed nets, the process of indoor residual spraying in homes, administration of larvicides in breeding sites, diagnostic services, therapeutic modalities, chemoprophylaxis of the infection, and the active and passive surveillance activities.[10],[11],[12] Most of these interruptions resulted because of the lockdown which was imposed to contain the COVID-19 infection and due to the alterations in the production and supply of various essentials (viz. antimalarial drugs, diagnostic kits, insecticides, insecticide-treated nets, etc.).[9],[10],[11],[12],[13]
Potential Strategies to Contain Coronavirus Disease-2019 and Malaria | |  |
There is no point in complaining about the developments that have already happened, the best strategy will be to consider the different facets of COVID-19 infection containment as opportunities and then act accordingly.[14],[15],[16],[17],[18] This has to begin with proactive leadership, wherein the policymakers take decisions based on scientific evidence and mathematical modeling, and this should be reflected in all steps that are being taken for containing both the infections.[14],[15] One of the most effective strategies to contain both the infections is through the strengthening of surveillance activities, and this calls for the need to employ the surveillance system established for COVID-19 to be simultaneously utilized for malaria as well.[16],[17] The field workers, which are involved in either manual contact tracing or surveillance/case management/vector control of malaria should strictly adhere to the standard infection prevention and control measures.[14],[19]
The next approach has to be an intensification of research and development activities, as this is very much required not only to add some life to the malaria elimination campaign but also for interrupting the chain of transmission of COVID-19 or its prompt management.[19],[20] Any progress in terms of the development of new diagnostics, potential drugs, potent vaccines, or technical advancements, can prove to be of immense utility.[19],[20],[21] There is also a need to avoid duplication of actions and employ a multidisciplinary team (as is done in the case of COVID-19) to expedite the activities which can aid in malaria elimination. In the battle against COVID-19 infection, a number of digital applications (viz. digital proximity tracing, reporting cases in real-time, etc.) were introduced, which in turn significantly helped to contain the infection.[14] On a similar note, there is a definite need to employ digital technologies, which should cover reported cases, clinical outcomes, diagnostic tools, interventions, vector surveillance, etc., all in one application to streamline the overall activities.[14],[20],[21],[22]
To contain the spread of the COVID-19 infection, all points of entry and exit were closely monitored and people were subjected to laboratory tests before their arrival or departure.[22],[23] In fact, the positive people were isolated, while the contacts were quarantined, and that aided us in containing the spread of the infection. This aspect of screening at borders is missing in case of malaria, and there is an immense need to strengthen the same at all points of entry and exit.[23],[24] On a similar note, even the migrant people should be screened for both COVID-19 and malaria infection, and based on the results, appropriate actions need to be taken.[23],[24],[25] Further, one of the very essential aspects of COVID-19 containment was the support that we received from the general population.[26] This could have not been possible if we would have failed to pass on the correct information to the community on a timely basis and taken care of the various prevailing myths and misconceptions. Even though we are still fighting against the misinformation, there is a definite need to empower the community with the desired information pertaining to malaria, so that people join the government movement and work together for malaria elimination.[25],[26],[27]
The next strategy which can aid in the containment of both COVID-19 and malaria infection is in terms of identification of the potential hotspots and taking intensified steps in these locations to eliminate the same. This will essentially require the support of diagnostic tools and any kind of digital tool employment will significantly aid the overall process.[16],[17],[18],[19],[20] Both these infections cannot be contained by the health sector alone, rather we will definitely need the support of different sectors in the efforts to ensure better implementation. The policymakers have to ensure that the available resources are allocated rationally and that all the essential services are offered free of cost to the general population.[21]
At this stage, we must realize that the governments alone cannot make sustained progress unless the local population also joins the campaign and work together.[17],[26] Working together means the members of the community should adhere to the standard infection prevention and control measures in case of COVID-19 (viz. social distancing, using a face mask, practicing hand hygiene, avoiding unnecessary travels, getting vaccinated at their turn, coughing etiquettes, etc.) and malaria infection (such as not sleeping outdoors, avoiding the collection of water, and not interfering with insecticide residual spray).[17],[18],[22],[24] Finally, in a long-term perspective, we have to enhance the preparedness level of the health-care delivery system and be ready with an action plan for any public health emergency, thereby continuing the ongoing activities by making them sustainable.[28]
Conclusion | |  |
In conclusion, in the process of fighting against the COVID-19 infection, we have ignored the delivery of essential services pertaining to malaria. This calls for the need to revisit the planned and implemented services for COVID-19 infection and use the existing mechanism for implementing the strategies required for malaria elimination.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References | |  |
1. | Nkengasong JN, Mankoula W. Looming threat of COVID-19 infection in Africa: Act collectively, and fast. Lancet 2020;395:841-2. |
2. | |
3. | Sherrard-Smith E, Hogan AB, Hamlet A, et al. The potential public health consequences of COVID-19 on malaria in Africa. Nat Med 2020;26:1411-6. |
4. | |
5. | Heuschen AK, Lu G, Razum O, et al. Public health-relevant consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on malaria in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. Malar J 2021;20:339. |
6. | Vaughan A. Covid-19 could have disastrous impacts on HIV, TB and malaria. New Sci 2020;247:8. |
7. | Hussein MI, Albashir AA, Elawad OA, et al. Malaria and COVID-19: Unmasking their ties. Malar J 2020;19:457. |
8. | Aborode AT, David KB, Uwishema O, et al. Fighting COVID-19 at the expense of malaria in Africa: The consequences and policy options. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2021;104:26-9. |
9. | Chiodini J. COVID-19 and the impact on malaria. Travel Med Infect Dis 2020;35:101758. |
10. | Rogerson SJ, Beeson JG, Laman M, et al. Identifying and combating the impacts of COVID-19 on malaria. BMC Med 2020;18:239. |
11. | Hogan AB, Jewell BL, Sherrard-Smith E, et al. Potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria in low-income and middle-income countries: A modelling study. Lancet Glob Health 2020;8:e1132-41. |
12. | Ajayi IO, Ajumobi OO, Falade C. Malaria and COVID-19: Commonalities, intersections and implications for sustaining malaria control. Pan Afr Med J 2020;37:1. |
13. | Zawawi A, Alghanmi M, Alsaady I, et al. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on malaria elimination. Parasite Epidemiol Control 2020;11:e00187. |
14. | Rahi M, Baharia RK, Das P, et al. Overlaying COVID-19 mitigation plans on malaria control infrastructures. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2021;115:6-8. |
15. | Tchoumi SY, Diagne ML, Rwezaura H, et al. Malaria and COVID-19 co-dynamics: A mathematical model and optimal control. Appl Math Model 2021;99:294-327. |
16. | Afai G, Banze AR, Candrinho B, et al. Challenges for malaria surveillance during the COVID-19 emergency response in Nampula, Mozambique, January – May 2020. Pan Afr Med J 2021;38:254. |
17. | Mohan A, Wara UU, Amjad SW, et al. Malaria amidst COVID-19 in India: Challenges, efforts, and recommendations. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health 2021;12:100867. |
18. | Torres K, Alava F, Soto-Calle V, et al. Malaria situation in the Peruvian amazon during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020;103:1773-6. |
19. | Sands P. HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria: How can the impact of COVID-19 be minimised? Lancet Glob Health 2020;8:e1102-3. |
20. | Raman J, Barnes KI, Baker L, et al. Maintaining focus on administering effective malaria treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. S Afr Med J 2020;111:13-6. |
21. | Diptyanusa A, Zablon KN. Addressing budget reduction and reallocation on health-related resources during COVID-19 pandemic in malaria-endemic countries. Malar J 2020;19:411. |
22. | Brooke BD, Raman J, Frean J, et al. Implementing malaria control in South Africa, Eswatini and southern Mozambique during the COVID-19 pandemic. S Afr Med J 2020;110:1072-6. |
23. | Correa-Salazar C, Amon JJ. Cross-border COVID-19 spread amidst malaria re-emergence in Venezuela: A human rights analysis. Global Health 2020;16:118. |
24. | Shi B, Zheng J, Xia S, et al. Accessing the syndemic of COVID-19 and malaria intervention in Africa. Infect Dis Poverty 2021;10:5. |
25. | Rodriguez-Valero N, Vera I, Torralvo MR, et al. Malaria prophylaxis approach during COVID-19 pandemic. Travel Med Infect Dis 2020;38:101716. |
26. | Feldman M, Vernaeve L, Tibenderana J, et al. Navigating the COVID-19 crisis to sustain community-based malaria interventions in Cambodia. Glob Health Sci Pract 2021;9:344-54. |
27. | Thornton J. Covid-19: Keep essential malaria services going during pandemic, urges WHO. BMJ 2020;369:m1637. |
28. | Wang J, Xu C, Wong YK, et al. Preparedness is essential for malaria-endemic regions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 2020;395:1094-6. |
|